Satisfaction Guarantee

First time here?

usewelcome15 to get 15% off

Do you think that parents should protect the students or guide them through everything they want to know?

Argumentative essayIf it’s necessary the title could be changed according to the topic below.The topic is related to the following question: Do you think that parents should protect the students or guide them through everything they want to know?Supporting ideas may include themes as internet use, drugs, how to teach them how to be Succesful…Limit the composition just to an introduction, and three body paragraphs(2 supporting details and the counterclaim)just that.

Write an essay on human effects on global warming and pollution.

persuasive essay about the emerge on control global warming and pollution . it should be a couple of examples of those people who are saying there is NO emerge on this subject. then it should be my opinion which should be about why I am thinking exactly opposite from them and I think it is really important to do something about global warming and pollution. it has to be a introduction , then it has to be 4 paragraphs and each one of them must include a reason why I think it is important and the opposite opinion has to be in paragraph as well . at last it has to be a small conclusion too. {the main idea should be really persuasive and and it has to be real discuss about topic between my idea and the ideas of people against mine.}

Agree or disagree with the following statement: ENG 102 students should not be required to read short stories. Explain.

Write a 600-800 word argument essay, and try to incorporate Aristotles appeals. Do not use outside sources. You may only use the Norton anthology. I will evaluate you based on the following criteria: thesis, support, clarity, organization, and how well you address the prompt. Make a good impression. Respond to One (1) of the prompts completely I also need a good outline for this essay with roman numerals, A’s, and B’s Aristotle Appeals (Logical, Ethical, Emotional appeals) I want to disagree with the topic and say we should have to read them. My professor also wants it to be specific and include a story that we have read in the essay somewhere. One of the stories that we have read was “Sonny’s Blues” by James Baldwin. Could you throw in that this story was a great read and give details on why it was? He also asked us not to use a 3 point thesis statement because they talk too much about the essay at the beginning and that makes the readers feel like they have reread material.

Thought piece of Epistemology The Science of Truth Determination and our Evolved Neuro-Epistemology

Write a thought piece of The Science of Truth Determination and our Evolved Neuro-Epistemology (as a proposed unification of the three major schools) -[Epistemology is the way truth is distinguished from opinion. The major schools of Epistemology: Pragmatism, Coherence Theory of Truth, and Correspondence Theory of Truth are merged into a single Neuro-Epistemology which utilizes a novel Knowledge Categorization which distinguishes Knowledge of Self, Species, and Universe from mere historical contingency] You need to answer the thought piece question in the paper: What is truth .. what is knowledge .. and is our perception of this influenced by the surroundings within which we develop? -As always, your thought piece should be.. your thoughts. Please summarize the material as needed but focus on your own ideas and questions when possible. Incorporate material from videos when appropriate. And so on. Be as creative as you like. Required reading: From The Greatest Show on Earth by Richard Dawkins, preface and Chapter 2 Dogs, Cows, and Cabbages, pages 21 42. The most important concept in this chapter is that of Essentialism .. we, seemingly instinctively, mistake giving something a name for knowledge. Just knowing what something is called (especially considering that different people may call the same thing by a different name etc).. does not mean that you have KNOWLEDGE of that thing Video: Richard Feynman – The World from another point of view -Feyman again here (and we will go back to him again at the end of class when discussing the nature of cognition).. this time discussing the nature of what it means to really know something. -The key, as stated above, is that knowing the NAME of something is different from having genuine knowledge of that something

Write a paper of the film report of “Fist of Fury”

Film: Fist of Fury Details: Briefly summarize the film first and then describe your reactions and reflections. You may focus on any aspects of the film, such as plot, characters, ideology, cinematography, style, choreography of action, and so on. Do not write on two or more films, or on films outside scheduled class screenings. Give a title to your short paper. At the end of the paper, please write a sentence to indicate the manner, time, and place of viewing the film, for example, Wednesday evening screening, an online link, your own DVD, etc.